TEN COMMONLY MIS-EXPRESSED EXPRESSIONS
4
Posted on: 10-2-2012 by: Brian Wasko
10
Horse and Bit
Most common expressions get passed down orally. We hear them at a young age, and they work their way into our everyday parlance. Most of us can’t remember the first time we heard expressions like, “as a matter of fact,” “by the way,” or “good riddance.” Most likely we use hundreds of such idioms on a regular basis without ever giving much thought to the oddness of their literal constructions and what we mean when we use them.
One problem with this oral tradition, however, is that eventually, someone will hear them wrong, confuse them, or pass on misheard versions. Below are ten common idiomatic expressions that are commonly mis-expressed.
The actual expression is “toe the line.” The image that ought to be conjured is of sailors standing in formation, not the hauling in of a rope. The origins of the expression are disputed, but the best guess is that it comes from the British Royal Navy at a time when seamen went often barefoot and were commanded to fall in for inspection by placing their toes along a line or board on the deck of a ship. Thus, to toe the line means to speak or behave in a manner dictated by a group one is affiliated with.
Because toe and tow are homophones, there’s no way of knowing if people using the expression get it right. The truth comes out only when they put it in writing.
There’s lots of debate on this expression meaning “an uncanny likeness.” Many have suggested that the expression was originally “spit and image” or even “splitting image,” but there is little to substantiate either. Some linguists believe it derives from “spitten image,” meaning a child so like the parent he might have been spit, or spitten, out of the parent’s mouth.
Whatever the origin and whether or not “spitting image” is a corruption of the original, it is now common and accepted as is. It probably shouldn’t even be on the list, but some insist it’s a mistake.
This is a simple corruption. The expression is for all intents and purposes, which was originally to all intents and purposes. Intents and purposes are essentially synonyms, an intentional redundancy, or pleonasm. Still, the expression has a specific idiomatic meaning that’s not obvious from a literal reading. When something is said to be true “for all intents and purposes” this means that, while it may not be technically true, it is close enough that we may proceed as though it is. Here’s an example from The Phrase Finder:
Isaac Newton’s Laws of Motion aren’t 100% precise in describing the motion of objects that approach the speed of light. However, for a man on a horse who measures time by a pocket watch, they are, for all intents and purposes, accurate.
WRITEATHOME STUDENTS WRITE BETTER. CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE!
This makes me laugh, but the mistake is understandable. It’s a classic example of eggcorn. The correct idiom is “It’s a dog-eat-dog world,” meaning it’s a tough, competitive place where survival belongs to the fittest.
The bit is a metal mouthpiece used for controlling horses. Horses who are restless to run have a tendency to gnaw or bite it. Thus, if someone is anxious to get going, he is “chomping at the bit.” But the older version of the idiom is “champing at the bit.” Champ is an archaic word for biting or chewing noisily. We now more commonly use the word chomp to mean the same, so it makes sense that the idiom has changed as well. I don’t consider “chomping at the bit” to be an error so much as a reasonable modernization of the expression. Still, some people get picky about these things, so you might want to stick to the original “champing” version in your written work.
Another funny eggcorn. The idiom, which is actually rather clear in its meaning is “a blessing in disguise.” It refers, as expected, to a fortunate circumstance that doesn’t appear to be fortunate at first glance. (If the blessing were in the skies, what good would it do us?)
The correct saying is “one and the same.” This is another intentional redundancy, or pleonasm. It simply means “the same” or “the same one.” Samuel Clemens and Mark Twain are one and the same.
Ha! I’ve heard this more than once and I always chuckle. The correct idiom here is “nip it in the bud.” It means to stop something when it is just beginning. It refers to cutting, or nipping, off flower buds before they bloom. It has nothing to do with anyone’s hind quarters.
Originally, the full expression was “If that’s what you think, you’ve got another think coming.” It was a humorously-intended play on words. Not that idioms have to make sense, but “another think coming” makes more sense in this context than “another thing coming.” Still, it’s easy to see how the mistake was made and repeated.
It’s “a tough row to hoe.” Farmers hoe rows in fields intended for crops. Nobody in their right mind takes a hoe to a road.
The expression refers to rough going or hard work ahead: With all the strong teams in the NFC East this year, the Eagles have a tough row to hoe to return to the playoffs.
