InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 2978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2014

Re: None

Monday, 05/23/2016 4:06:02 PM

Monday, May 23, 2016 4:06:02 PM

Post# of 46341
DD on Cuozzo


Issue in Cuozzo: (1) Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in IPR proceedings, the Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning, and, (2) Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding is judicially unreviewable.

A live webcast will be available at http://www.pijip.org/apr-25-supreme-court-series-kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley-sons-and-cuozzo-speed-techonologies-llc-v-lee at the start of the program.

Prof. Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law (Moderator)


Panel for Cuozzo (co-sponsored by the Federal Circuit Bar Association):

Prof. Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law (Panelist)
Adjunct Prof. James Toupin, American University Washington College of Law (Panelist, Invited)
Jeffrey Wall, Counsel for Petitioner
Eric Citron, Counsel for Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, in Support of Petitioner
Greg Rapawy, Counsel for Dell et al., in Support of Respondent K
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News