InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3261
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/27/2014

Re: None

Friday, 05/20/2016 3:54:08 PM

Friday, May 20, 2016 3:54:08 PM

Post# of 81999
What it comes down to, is if the government agencies like NIST
decide IPQA is a necessary part of the process for critical
components.

Many companies right now, see SGLB tech as a costly addition
to their small lot prints.

Once we get a few years down the line and companies are running
10+ printers with critical parts, as Honeywell and GEAviation
are currently doing, we will see SGLB skyrocket.

FDA, FAA, Armed forces equipment. These are our near term
targets that may require our technology the quickest.

Hopefully NIST develops an procedure that requires data from
each build as Sigma can currently produce that everyone else
is trying to catch up to.

SLM is the only company with weld pool monitoring patents besides
SGLB, and they are still in the beta phases of their software.

http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.8036.pdf

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/tech-beat/tb20150414.cfm
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SASI News