Followers | 404 |
Posts | 57916 |
Boards Moderated | 16 |
Alias Born | 05/01/2010 |
Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:51:24 AM
I was just thinking about the quote recently posted here. "Not unusual for companies to be charged by regulators and if often happens at the behest of those who have large naked short positions"
My question is why an abusive naked shorter who supposedly has a "large" position, would report a company whose stock they're shorting? If the stock of the referenced publicly traded entity were to be revoked, the shorter would lose his entire investment.
Sometimes it's best to use common sense rather than attempting to make silk from a sows ear.
Of course shorting HESG is laughable seeing as how it's already without a bid.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM