Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:06:33 AM
Bidness Etc reviews how analysts are reacting to speculation that the deal will be terminated soon
By Micheal Kaufman on May 9, 2016 at 9:43 am EST
http://www.bidnessetc.com/68663-energy-transfer-equity-lpwilliams-companies-merger-called-o/
Energy Transfer Equity LP (NYSE:ETE) and Williams Companies’ Inc.’s (NYSE:WMB) $37.7 billion merger is on the verge of falling part, owing to increasing differences between the two, and challenging market conditions. Analysts who had previously expected the deal to be finalized over the coming months, are now expecting a break-up.
Since Energy Transfer had offered to pay $6 billion to Williams Companies shareholders, the deal was a win-win. With the acquisition, Energy Transfer CEO and chairman Kelcy Warren wanted to build the world’s biggest owner and operator of an oil and gas pipeline network. He had expected the cost and revenue synergies to stand at $2 billion.
The ongoing dispute between the managements at the two companies, along with a prolonged decline in commodity prices, is forcing the deal towards its end. The multi-billion dollar merger, which could have resulted in one of the world’s biggest energy infrastructure companies, took around seven months to reach this stage.
The ongoing problems have convinced traders and analysts that the deal will not close. Last month, Evercore ISI analyst Timm Schneider conducted a survey of clients, finding that around 50% of his clients expected the deal to be finalized. However, owing to the worsening market situation, the spread coming from those expecting the merger to break apart has increased. According to Bloomberg, the spread has more than doubled since April.
The reaction of analysts can be gauged from the fact that instead of pricing the companies together, the sell-side firms have started valuing the energy giants individually. Raymond James & Associates analyst Darren Horowitz also mentioned that he is adjusting Williams Companies’ valuation to take into account the current situation. His current valuation is taking “Energy Transfer out of the picture.”
Plunging Deal Value
Since the announcement of the deal, United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (NYSEARCA:BNO) has fallen almost 16.5%, while United States Oil Fund LP (ETF) (NYSEARCA:USO) has dropped 25.5%. The continuous decline in oil prices has eroded investor confidence regarding both the companies, and has increased the merger arbitrage. Energy Transfer shares have plunged 44% since September 28, while Williams Companies shares have dropped over 52.5%.
The low oil and gas prices have made Energy Transfer’s offered price expensive. Including debt assumption, the deal was worth more than $37 billion in September. However, it is now valued at less than $20 billion. The cash portion of $6 billion, which was just a small part of the initial proposal, now carries a high weightage in the offer.
Low Oil Prices: Not the Only Reason
Apart from weak commodity prices, the clash between the two companies has also raised doubts about the completion of the merger. The conflict erupted in March, when Energy Transfer issued preferred units to some of its investors. Williams Companies had previously rejected a proposal to offer common units to the general public. Thus, in order to finance part of the deal, Energy Transfer issued new shares in a private placement, without Williams Companies’ approval. Mr. Warren also received 50% of the new shares in the private offering. He already owns 18% of the company.
Dissatisfied with the offering, Williams Companies deemed it “malicious.” It said with the private placement, Energy Transfer has breached the terms of the merger agreement and has given preferential treatment to some of its shareholders against others. The company later filed a law suit against Energy Transfer and Mr. Warren in April.
It did not end here. Latham & Watkins’ refusal to provide a tax opinion to the deal ignited another round of arguments between the two companies. Energy Transfer’s law adviser said it cannot deliver the “721 Opinion” to the transaction, as it believes the exchange offer does not qualify as a “reorganization” that would free investors from tax liabilities. Latham said it had also received the same opinion from other tax advisory authorities.
In its 1Q earnings call, Mr. Warren emphasized that the deal could not be completed without the necessary tax opinion under Section 721 (a). According to news sources, he repeated around seven times that the merger could not be completed in its current form. Jefferies LLC analyst Chris Sighinolfi believes Energy Transfer’s recent comments during the earnings call have strengthened investors’ belief that the deal is unlikely to happen.
What if the Deal Fails?
Recently, the $34.6 billion tie-up between the world’s two biggest oilfield services providers, Halliburton Company (NYSE:HAL) and Baker Hughes ended. Increased pressure from regulatory authorities, including the US Department of Justice (DoJ) and the European Commission forced the two merger partners to call off the deal. The break-up has not only affected the future plans of both the companies, but also cost Halliburton around $3.5 billion.
The failure of the merger would cost each company billions of dollars. If Williams Companies backs out, it would have to compensate Energy Transfer with $1.48 billion. If Energy Transfer is the one to call it quits, it would not just have to face millions of dollars worth of lawsuits, but its reputation would also be hurt.
Energy Transfer has chased Williams Companies for months. In July, the company first made an unsolicited offer, which was rejected. In September, it approached Williams Companies with a new proposal. The offer had $6 billion in cash, which lured Williams Companies’ management to enter into the deal.
Certainly, after a yearlong chase and more than seven months under the merger agreement, if Energy Transfer withdraws from the deal, it would lose the confidence of investors and analysts. Mr. Sighinolfi also mentioned that the termination would not be good for Energy Transfer’s “reputation as a consolidator in the future.”
Finally, although the deal seems to be on the verge of breaking apart, the official deadline for the closing of the merger is June 28. The two companies still have time to work on the terms of the agreement to solve the tax issue. It now depends on the flexibility, and their willingness to finalize the deal as soon as possible.
"Then there was a woman, a lion of a woman."
Recent WMB News
- Form SD - Specialized disclosure report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2024 08:28:24 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2024 03:57:53 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/13/2024 07:39:03 PM
- Williams CEO to Present at 2024 Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference • Business Wire • 08/27/2024 12:00:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2024 01:03:29 PM
- Form 424B2 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(2)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/12/2024 08:06:37 PM
- Williams Prices $1.5 Billion of Senior Notes • Business Wire • 08/09/2024 12:25:00 AM
- Form FWP - Filing under Securities Act Rules 163/433 of free writing prospectuses • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/08/2024 11:57:48 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/08/2024 01:07:39 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/05/2024 08:17:58 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/05/2024 08:16:05 PM
- Williams Delivers Strong Second-Quarter Results • Business Wire • 08/05/2024 08:15:00 PM
- Williams Reports Progress on Environmental Performance Metrics • Business Wire • 07/31/2024 01:15:00 PM
- Williams Announces Quarterly Cash Dividend • Business Wire • 07/30/2024 03:26:00 PM
- Williams to Report Second-Quarter 2024 Financial Results on Aug. 5; Earnings Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled for Aug. 6 • Business Wire • 07/16/2024 08:15:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/10/2024 08:45:32 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/10/2024 03:12:00 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2024 08:17:55 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2024 08:16:39 PM
- Williams Delivers Strong First-Quarter Results; Positioned to Hit Top Half of 2024 Financial Guidance Range • Business Wire • 05/06/2024 08:15:00 PM
- Williams Announces Quarterly Cash Dividend • Business Wire • 04/30/2024 03:19:00 PM
- Williams to Volunteer at nearly 100 Community Projects Across 17 States • Business Wire • 04/18/2024 03:36:00 PM
- Williams to Report First-Quarter 2024 Financial Results on May 6; Earnings Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled for May 7 • Business Wire • 04/16/2024 08:15:00 PM
- TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF ANGELA D. JOHN TO ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS • PR Newswire (US) • 03/21/2024 11:00:00 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/07/2024 09:35:39 PM
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM