InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 39870
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: Dolph340 post# 43812

Thursday, 04/28/2016 1:14:06 PM

Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:14:06 PM

Post# of 81093
There has not been any ruling by the Judge yet on which to comment. But, there has been some behind the scenes action.

1) 4/12/2016 - Supreme Energy notified the court it had evidence to submit in opposition to Energy Supreme LLC's motion for partial summary judgment.

2) 4/13/2016 - SE asks for "enlargement of time" to submit evidence. It seems all evidence was to be submitted by 5:00 PM (EST) 4/12/2016. However, SE's evidence was not submitted by fax until 4:48 PM on 4/12/2016 and the fax did not complete until 5:21 PM on 4/12/2016. I cannot find any express ruling that extra time was granted, but, other activity makes it appear that the request was granted.

3) 4/13/2016 - Energy Supreme files a "Motion to strike" in response to SE's actions.

motion to strike

n. a request for a judge's order to eliminate all or a portion of the legal pleading (complaint, answer) of the opposition on any one of several grounds.

Read more: http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1292#ixzz478ps0WJm

4) 4/22/2016 - Energy Supreme files updated notice of email addresses.

5) 4/25/2016 - Energy Supreme LLC serves four sets of "Interrogatories" to IFUS and Supreme Energy. Such Interrogatories are sent in an effort to gain information to be used in determining damages.

"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"