So how do you explain that deal. Either they thought they were on the verge of monetizing the patents and a few months would be no problem or to go with your theory they would never have monetized them so then why would the company accept that financing arrangement? I want to know why they agreed to those financing terms. If you think that's bogus than that is your right. I still want to know how I as an investor lost my share of those patents right at the end.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.