InvestorsHub Logo

F6

Followers 59
Posts 34538
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/02/2003

F6

Re: SilverSurfer post# 244847

Tuesday, 02/16/2016 2:01:56 PM

Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:01:56 PM

Post# of 481334
SilverSurfer -- try answering the question rather than flinging yet more of your feces

of course any Senator is entitled to vote against any nominee, and of course the current Republican-controlled Senate is entitled to vote down any Obama nominee -- and Schumer never said that the Senate should refuse to even hold a vote on a nominee, as the current Republican-controlled Senate has said it will refuse to even hold a vote on any Obama nominee to replace Fat Tony -- e.g. http://www.twcnews.com/nys/capital-region/news/2016/02/15/senator-schumer-on-scotus-vacancy-comments.html (with comments), and (uploaded by a [similarly clueless] Tea Partier):

Chuck Schumer In 2007: 'We Should Not Confirm Any Bush Nominee To The Supreme Court'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnpjs45D7OY [with comments]

by the way, on each of the days of the week, including Fridays, plenty of priests eat meat

and see e.g. (linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120521758 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120523022 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120526627 and preceding (and any future following)


Greensburg, KS - 5/4/07

"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."
from John Philpot Curran, Speech
upon the Right of Election, 1790


F6

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.