Followers | 293 |
Posts | 4644 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 10/12/2008 |
Saturday, February 13, 2016 10:09:35 AM
You are welcome camacho.
1. so defendants denied having an admin rec in perry/lamberth (although they weren't ordered to produce one), and now in saxton/reade they are being ordered to produce in one month?
Yes. One month.
The Lamberth court did not order the entire administrative record and declared it irrelevant in that decision to dismiss on 9/30/14. (See: FHFA’s Justifications for Executing the Third Amendment and, Consequently, the Accompanying Administrative Record, Are Irrelevant for § 4617(f) Analysis - http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Perry/13-cv-01025-0051.pdf pp. 21-22)
However, prior to that decision on 9/18/2014, the Plaintiffs' made a motion (Plaintiff Perry Capital LLC's Motion for the Supplementation of Defendants' Administrative Records) to obtain a full administrative record that should exist as required by law.
Such a bald admission would indicate a violation of APA law (5 U.S.C. §§ 551-559, 5 U.S.C. § 706 - see: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II and https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/706). The FHFA's has referred to a "Document Compilation" and has not admitted to having a "whole" administrative record related to the Net Worth Sweep. The Defendants, thereby, straddle a complete denial of a "whole" administrative record related to the Net Worth Sweep while making submission of certain documents that "stand in" for the administrative record (a partial set "administrative records" that are not equal to a whole administrative record). So, no, something must be produced that qualifies as the "whole" administrative record that is related to the formation of the third amendment to the PSPAs.
3. sure, it s very odd that there wouldnt be one all things considered, but this isnt an ordinary situation clearly. if defendent wasnt tsy, how lenient would a judge be in such a situation? Judge Judy wouldn't be happy that s for sure.
A court order was made that straightforwardly requires the Defendants to produce an administrative record. The response to that order will come no later than March 10, 2016. After that response, studied consideration of Chief Judge Linda R. Reade's possible responses to it can be engaged.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM