InvestorsHub Logo

955

Followers 78
Posts 8055
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2009

955

Re: obiterdictum post# 329020

Friday, 02/12/2016 5:27:35 PM

Friday, February 12, 2016 5:27:35 PM

Post# of 800706
Interesting. Thank you for finding that.

So docket #60 may contain Judge Reade's opinion and could be SEALED as well.




On February 9, 2016, Chief Judge Linda R. Reade filed an order denying the pending motions for dismissal as moot. As mentioned previously, the document number for that order is #60 and currently there is no access to the document. This information is found in the order for Defendants to file an administrative record - http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Saxton/15-00047-0062.pdf

As of 2/12/2016 at 3:59 pm, #60 is still missing from Pacer's current document report. See abbreviated docket report below.

Date Filed - - - #
02/10/2016 - #62
Docket Text

ORDER Regarding Administrative Record. On 2/9/16, Chief Judge Linda R Reade filed an order denying the pending Motion to Dismiss as moot. Accordingly, the Court finds Defendants are now required to file the administrative record. The administrative record must be filed with the Clerk of Court not later than 3/10/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 2/10/16. (ksy) (Entered: 02/10/2016)

02/09/2016 - #61
Docket Text

SEALED Amended Complaint for Declatory and Injunctive Relief and Damages against All Defendants filed by Bradley Paynter, Ida Saxton, Thomas Saxton. (pac) (Entered: 02/09/2016)

12/31/2015 - #59
Docket Text

SEALED Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their 51 Motion for Leave to Amend the 1 Complaint by Bradley Paynter, Ida Saxton, Thomas Saxton. (Johnson, Alexander) Modified text on 12/31/2015 (skm). (Entered: 12/31/2015)