This is really going to be interesting. I agree with some posters who say it could have been nothing more than access that corrupted and in that interpreting things in a more positive manner than intended. If there was something that needed clarification, those that could remained silent, and thereby complicit.
Those folks were so blinded by those who had serious, legitimate concerns that they could not separate those from the yahoos that
that came from later group were reactionary..they don't have to like that but it's the truth. It was the die hards that always piled on when the truthiness veered from the fable that they felt was theirs and they were going to do everything in their power to keep it that way. Hence blocking posters, eliminating what they felt was not steering the discourse in a way they found agreeable, not the group. And as always greeted with a if you don't like it leave, you need a vacation from posting, you should sell your stock if you feel this way.
All of these look incredibly suspect in light of what has gone down.
The "bashers" as they have been labelled turns out were wrongly named. "Seers" is more apt. The "pumperatti" well ..that is the moniker that fits like a glove.
Numbers don't lie, posters should never be banned. A company that produces will shut those arguments down. Those that continue in that fashion against results will be the ones looking foolish.
