Tuesday, February 09, 2016 6:46:12 PM
It wasn't too different with Sinopec who is public but who was controlled by the Chinese government. They have no reason to disclose anything either and their E&P division is so dwarfed by refining that nothing was ever material.
You have to question ERHC's choice of partners. While both had a lot of money to throw around, ERHC couldn't have picked better partners if they wanted to hide and obfuscate. Unfortunately neither is known for their technical expertise let alone their openness. That's a problem.
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 05:35:35 PM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM