EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

[skorz]

YOU have no idea what happened. This notion that COO was the aggressor is only explained from one side, EPGL. COO said there was a settlement component and that's ALL they said. Anything else coming out of that experience is either directly from EPGL or someone speculating on this message board.

This board screamed to the heavens that the COO deal was going to be the pop. That this is what we've all been hoping for. EPGL was beating the success drum loudly. Now you're saying that COO is not a forward thinking technology company? They're the "BILLION DOLLAR LEADER AMONG GIANTS" IN THEIR TECH SECTOR.

"If anything giving us the opportunity to meet with other companies is a good thing"? I still believe that COO should have been the ace-in-the-hole agreement to get this "company" off the ground. Also, haven't we been told endlessly that several other "not forward thinking technology" GIANTS have already kicked the tires on EPGL? where's the explosive deals?