InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 5279
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2014

Re: brentkosta post# 13454

Friday, 02/05/2016 10:44:04 AM

Friday, February 05, 2016 10:44:04 AM

Post# of 39824
$DKSC


There must have been some sort of give and take transaction between the 2 parties.

Certainly they didn't buy these shares as a favour to help dksc.

It wasn't an issuance. Was it?

If the shares were issued by DKSC then White chapel would have provided a service.



You raise interesting questions that I cannot at this time answer. .. Here
are a few guesses :


What we do no is that the A/S was increased last year, actually in late
2014 if I remember right. ... I voted on the A/S increase in 2014,


We know that the O/S increased as well, from watching here during the
year :

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DKSC/profile

((( Well, I used to watch... I stopped doing so in Mid-2015 when it became
clear that DAKSHiDIN was a DEaD DUcK Company. .... Dead Duck Quack-
ing, so to speak. )))


WHITEchapel may have been issued shares for cash. .... DAKSHiDIN
does not file ANYTHING, EVER - - with THE S.E.C., so we can never
know.



I imagine that the "service" whiteCHAPEL provides or "provided" was to give
an entry level Company management guidance or to invest in it directly.


Everything above was guesses derived from available evidence found
in an internet research project
regarding WhiteChapel. Research anyone
on this Board can do - - just look up "tubby Chris Haigh" & "WhiteChapel",
and see where the evidence leads you.



You might want to use .. "Christopher Haigh" .. instead of "Chris Haigh"


Until2017