and since my post you replied to points to considerable overlap ..
- Clinton’s plan would defend and build on the Dodd Frank Wall Street reform law. Clinton has pledged to fight any GOP efforts to weaken financial reform and would preserve that law’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a Warren brainchild. Clinton would toughen up oversight over financial institutions in ways Warren has called for, though Clinton would not go quite as far .. http://www.vox.com/2015/10/8/9482521/hillary-clinton-financial-reform .. as Warren in this regard. Clinton’s plan offers details on how she would rein in the sort of shadow banking that led to the financial crisis, also an important Warren priority. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119896015 .. -
between the two on Wall Street today i'm thinking the difference could now be as much a populist notion as anything of substance which could become reality .. surely if you picture what either could hope to get through congress in real terms there may not be much 'real' difference at all.
I thought the point made in mine that by endorsing Hillary, Elizabeth could have more input into policy was a good one i hadn't seen here before.
Agree there is no real good reason to endorse either until later, guessing maybe IF after the primaries in the two 'Bernie states' Iowa and New Hampshire, Feb 1 and Feb 9, and the two 'Hillary states' of Nevada and South Carolina on Feb 23 and 27 .. say early March IF is my guess could be the earliest.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.