InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 270
Posts 7998
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/14/2009

Re: big-yank post# 16495

Saturday, 01/09/2016 2:56:05 AM

Saturday, January 09, 2016 2:56:05 AM

Post# of 17746
after reading this post of yours i went back through your post history,

you're quite the interesting fellow...

favoring fnmas for various reasons (2015EOY has passed now)

liquidation scenarios,

verge of bankruptcy (haha, that's not true at all. look at the forensic audit reports)

commons vs pfds (i don't see the diachotomy here... it's us vs USA) where USA is the government trying to rob its citizenry of the two pillars of equal opportunity housing... g-fees should not be a tax on home ownership and the tax collectors have been paid back $100B more than they forced down the throats of the GSEs.

then your theories on delaware rounding off first seem off.. that comes after sweeney which comes after perry appeals, and then there's another lawsuit that's in the pipe for you to smoke i'm sure... this is a $5T heist

this isn't about what i honestly believe.

this is about what can be proven and overturned in court... and this is about the process of which court overturns what and how things playout from there because after all FHFA is in charge, bro.

that same FHFA that has been trying to stuff the pooch and run off with all the gold.

yeah those guys.. so anyway, i'm in the preferreds because i expect more of the same with guardrails (courts) and the first to take a dive is the third amendment, and then the question is.. and i could be wrong here... how do they recapitalize and how does all that stuff work out --- remember fhfa is in charge here

Glen Bradford, MBA
Industrial Engineer

FHFA Accounting Fraud Special Investigations Team