Exactly. It's not as simple as some people think. There is tremendous abuse in the market, for which the FDA must regulate for the health and safety of the public, but they also serve higher interests. Star may have been a target, but they could have legally maneuvered in a way to keep ABLOC on the shelves. But they didn't, and so the reason why they didn't becomes the resounding question. What interests are they serving primarily? I assure you, it was not the shareholders at the tIme, or the potential benefactors needs.
Nothing is that simple when business is involved, unless you want it to be.
Messages posted by individuals may be misleading, deceptive, or in error. If you disagree with a posting, feel free to voice your opinion. It is the policy of iHub to allow our members to freely discuss issues in a free and open manner