InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 300
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2013

Re: big-yank post# 321813

Friday, 11/27/2015 2:52:19 PM

Friday, November 27, 2015 2:52:19 PM

Post# of 792730
...and this post underscores your twisted two-sided concept of reality. In Post #321773 you state these two companies are 'claiming to be profitable', and in this post u say the swept funds being 'returned' the gov't is fair. First SWEPT FUNDS is just another way of you acknowledging the PROFITS are going to gov't. And 'returned' is a lie, how can anyone return to the gov't what the gov't never had, those profit are just being taken from the companies. You must've been a master at the game TWISTER, probably still the grand-wizard.



big-yank Friday, 11/27/15 02:23:53 PM
Re: navycmdr post# 321784
Post # of 321814

Thanks for this excellent post that underscores yet another way the Federal government is putting huge bucks into conserving the GSEs. This is another $250 M per year being spent to keep these enterprises alive and on the right track. This is just one more reason why swept funds being returned to government is both fair and also essential to conserving the GSEs.