i've worked with statistics myself, i'm sure you have as well. in every dataset if you look hard enough and reduce subsets enough you will always stumble upon one small group that shows some sort of correlation. it's usually chance. normally you decide what you want to prove, research it and check the data if your assumption was correct. looking back at research to see if it proves anything, and only then build your hypothesis, i think it's statistically very dangerous ground. anyway, we'll see over the next months/years i guess.
i also agree on Zack's. You can't take them seriously (nor can you most analysts, but that's a different story). Only reason anyone ever does is they market their "Zacks rank" pretty smart so that every one reads it, and nobody realizes there's no real analyst doing any fundamental analysis there, they're just opportunists trying to get noticed.
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM