InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 203
Posts 13655
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: fwh3334zeke post# 441394

Wednesday, 11/25/2015 3:03:59 PM

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:03:59 PM

Post# of 727574
fwh333, I believe the following explains this VERY WELL!

I also think it is very clear the following explanation explains many, many divisive actions here.
______________________________________________________

Piers Investors=Zero/Few Escrow Shares - ESCROW SHARES NEVER ISSUED for Investment

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Equity Investors=An Abundance of NewCo/WMIH Shares AND Escrow Shares
______________________________________________________

***More Evidence***The Holy Grail***WATCH for Investor Actions!

Link follows - Examiner

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229100722000000000002

***The Holy Grail***

The legal group Akin and Gump are discussing the scope of what the Examiner can examine and what he cannot examine.

Pages 70 - 72

http://www.reorgwmi.com/documents/HearingTranscripts/08-12229-20100720.PDF

We also have in there the part (b) of what is to be retained, and that is because in

negotiations that we had with all of the settling parties, with the equity committee

last week, with the FDIC, we did talk a great deal about the concept of the retained

assets.
Now, it's my position, Your Honor, that the examiner doesn't need to know

much with the retained assets other than say the assets are retained and therefore

the liquidating trust can go ahead and pursue them. They will still be there; they

can be carried through. But I understand that the equity committee is very

interested in having a neutral third party do an investigation of those retained

assets.



I just cannot help but LOVE my ESCROW SHARES MORE, MORE, MORE and MORE EVERYDAY but I know who cannot make this claim!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News