InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 199
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/08/2010

Re: None

Wednesday, 11/25/2015 2:31:33 PM

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:31:33 PM

Post# of 47790
If we are correct, then as I see it, Atty. Takos should therefore have been aware that Shaun was "in office" illegally once he got into the details of the two suits. Atty. Takos should then have been aware that Shaun would only able to retain his services on a personal basis, not on a corporate level. Our atty. should be able to confront Atty. Takos and let him know that he is on slim footing if he attempts to stick EXOBOX with a bill for services.