International Automated Systems (fka IAUS)

[scion]

Count VI: Injunction Under § 7402(a) Against Freeborn

151. The United States incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 118.

152. Freeborn, through his actions described above, including making false or fraudulent statements regarding the law and facts applicable to material matters under the internal revenue laws, facilitating customers’ claims for tax benefits to which they were not entitled, “sponsoring” additional customers into the solar energy scheme, and collecting “commissions” and/or other income from the abusive solar energy scheme, has substantially interfered, and continues to substantially interfere, with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws.

153. Unless enjoined, Freeborn has shown that he is in a position to, and likely will, continue to engage in unlawful conduct and to interfere with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws.

154. The United States will suffer irreparable injury if Freeborn is not enjoined.

155. Enjoining Freeborn is in the public interest because an injunction, backed by the Court’s contempt powers if needed, will prevent Freeborn from engaging in illegal conduct and will prevent harm to the United States.

156. The requested injunction against Freeborn is necessary or appropriate to stop his unlawful conduct and this Court should impose such injunctive relief under § 7402(a).


Extract -
Doc 2 PDF file
https://www.scribd.com/doc/291081416/USA-v-RaPower-3-Et-Al-Doc-2-Filed-23-Nov-15