International Automated Systems (fka IAUS)

[scion]

Count II: Injunction Under § 7402(a) Against IAS

127. The United States incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 118.

128. IAS, through its officers, directors, owners, employees, and/or other agents, made, and continues to make, false or fraudulent statements regarding the law and facts applicable to material matters under the internal revenue laws; facilitated, and continues to facilitate, customers’ claims for tax benefits to which they were not entitled; and collected, and continues to collect, income from the abusive solar energy scheme. These actions have substantially interfered, and continue to substantially interfere, with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws.

129. Unless enjoined, IAS has shown that it is in a position to, and likely will, continue to engage in such unlawful conduct and to interfere with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws.

130. The United States will suffer irreparable injury if IAS is not enjoined 131. Enjoining IAS is in the public interest because an injunction, backed by the Court’s contempt powers if needed, will stop IAS’s illegal conduct and the harm it causes the United States.

131. Enjoining IAS is in the public interest because an injunction, backed by the Court’s contempt powers if needed, will stop IAS’s illegal conduct and the harm it causes the United States.

132. The requested injunction against IAS is necessary or appropriate to stop its unlawful conduct and this Court should impose such injunctive relief under § 7402(a).


Extract -
Doc 2 PDF file
https://www.scribd.com/doc/291081416/USA-v-RaPower-3-Et-Al-Doc-2-Filed-23-Nov-15