InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 8986
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2013

Re: scottsmith post# 131135

Wednesday, 11/25/2015 12:43:15 AM

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:43:15 AM

Post# of 402819
Rosen had a few months to dig up more dirt. However, there initial claim was solely based on evidence from the Mako hit. How can Rosen explain "empty office", the drugs do not work, listing addresses of CTIX workers and so on... Yes, they might have a point on Menon's background, but the entire Mako piece will be used by Sullivan to defend CTIX. The title (Empty Office) will be the killer for Rosen. Also, how can Rosen defend it's quick, legal action PR soon after the SA article? That damns them more than anything.... One hour, was enough time to choose an anonymous author over any rebuttal/defense from CTIX??? Is there enough credibility to convict CTIX of any wrong doing? Mako was clearly fabricated "with lies" to enhance a short position.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News