InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 369
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/19/2015

Re: Zorax post# 332625

Tuesday, 11/24/2015 9:29:22 PM

Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:29:22 PM

Post# of 380539
Who took david Foley's phone number off roycapgp.com, and who took the website down?

Well let's see here, ntek is clearly linked to roycapgp.com, maybe it was someone at ntek. But, what if it wasn't ntek? If it was da fo, how does he do this from Taft?

Or perhaps Wong from omnivance.com, whose website was registered on the exact same date as Roycapgp.com, web mastered the Roycap website?

Speaking of omnivance btw, anyone who thinks ntek isn't a social media share selling enterprise, you should possibly rethink that:

http://omnivanceadvisors.com/services/public-relations/social-media/

It's ok to admit this, they have to do it to survive (dilution), but let's call a spade a spade shall we?

Omnivance, "as an investor in your company.." http://omnivanceadvisors.com/services/investor-relations/market-support/

Um, what? So, omnivance wants cheap shares for their "services", their website was registered the same day as Roycap, they "establish[ed] partners in the market making community." What the heck?

I can say the only good thing about the lawsuit for investors is that ntek will be forced to audit and these particulars will come out into the open - discovery phase will be great, nothing to hide, right? Well, it could be good, might be real bad. This is the little conundrum we face with a non reporting dark, unaudited company such as ntek.