I don't know what happens on them going back to without Forest if those dumb bondholders want to keep listening to their lawyers nonsense as they implied Sabine was willing to backout... if they took control they could leave Forest bondholders private and they remain public including all the new drills while partnered and as things go in bankruptcy buy assets from Forest if Judge allowed... that's just on the two little snips of info and imagination with knowledge of other news articles for a couple of score years... That's what I was wondering... as how is could it work since newer shareholders bought Sabine (49%) partnership with Forest (51%)
Those bondholders would still be getting their payments if they hadn't gone to lawyers, now they owe lawyers (? not if bankruptcy judge been stealing capital)... really out of the folder case here...
Owning shares or partnership units is not an endorsement of management to break the Sabbaths or to do any other unGodliness. I do not share in their sin or guilt and they mislead others on their own accord. I have no major stakes to influence any company.
