InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 176
Posts 16233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2008

Re: kennypooh post# 37751

Tuesday, 11/10/2015 2:39:41 PM

Tuesday, November 10, 2015 2:39:41 PM

Post# of 70634
GRPR. Ahhhh....there is no squabbling here. Nistel and I understand each others postings. We were using words to clarify our positions. Please read my last posting.

We understand that no one can take risk out of any stock you play here. Nistel plays it tight, using DD to determine if the risk is satisfactory to get in, I on the other hand do not find DD useful here but play the game of chance only. My entry is based on MY determination of potential worth (don't misunderstand me, I do DD to make a choice as to whether the risk is satisfactory to me).

Once in, I strictly play on current events - when the current events do not favor me, well, you can see what happens with GRPR. Obviously, I get killed! Doesn't always work that way but it does not mean that you should not do as I have done here, elsewhere, and win.

Nistel is out based on his mechanics. I am in based on mine. He is conservative while I take risk head on. "facts" exist to support both of these positions. We basically provide you with the extremes of the risk spectrum. What level of risk you are at depends where you fall in between us. But remember, winning in this game is the ONLY proof you will have to determine if your decision on play mechanics was the right one. We are not here solely to be entertained!