InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 176
Posts 16233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2008

Re: Nistel post# 37745

Monday, 11/09/2015 11:32:02 AM

Monday, November 09, 2015 11:32:02 AM

Post# of 70634
GRPR. From my perspective, I believe your motivation here is sincere. I am less inclined to say your posting provide factual information at the time of posting. What you provide is a perspective based upon your motivations. Understand that 'factual' does not occur until after the fact.

Preemptive commentary is only an opinion until the facts "prove" that your past opinions now hold water and the substance therein become factual. Credit given on having opinions that LATER become factual. I have a few of those myself. Honorable foresight! But I never give an opinion and present it as factual. Loads of conviction, yes, but factual, No.

For example, your OPINION that there is now 500MM O/S is not factual. It may become factual, and I do believe now it probably will be factual, but as of this date, it is an OPINION, not FACT.

MANY times today's bag-holders, on occasion here in pinkieland, end up with the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. I don't know, but I feel that it is important to put my hook in the water if I can expect to catch a fish. Sure, where I throw that hook in the water is important too and subject to speculation, but I do have my hook (or should I say hooks) in the water. Catching a fish, to me, is what it is all about.

You have any hooks in the water? Or do you just go around and tell others where not to throw theirs?