Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[gotmilk]

There is a difference between...

"... [Hurting in the Dark Shareholders should not question and understand past and current history of Bourque Industries] in an effort to get desired results."

and,

In an effort to understand why Bourque Industries remained a failed company during the time period John Bourque was in prison and Bourque Industries had ownership of all instructions to make Kryron, yet the acting CEO and Board of Directors choose to wait until John Bourque was released from prison.

Yes, doing this "to get desired results" whereby to understand the history of Bourque Industries so that the results of the past are not repeated if such past activity that prevented Bourque Industries from success, are still in place.

Please note, that the success so described has focus on BORK's pps to obtain a degree of recovery such that the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders can have the possibility of recovering a fraction of their now 99% investment lost that will represent more than just a small fraction.

To make it clear, there is a pronounce difference between the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders to "get desired results" and a "desired result" whereupon Bourque Industries becomes successful only for John Bourque, company officers, and those that have accumulated quantities of shares magnitudes greater than that of the number of shares the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders obtained in 2011 and still hold, with or without any averaging down.

So if I understand your position, its not to question the tactics by which John Bourque directly or indirectly instills activity taken by Bourque Industries, but simply ask nothing and do nothing and wait and once "results" arrive that are not good for the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders its best to continue in your view not to change your approach.

This was the approach of those in 2011 at the point in time BORK hit a high and started to fall, resulting into a near total collapse.

Once again, all activity taken by company officers, including the "invisible hand" of John Bourque while in prison, have been done so for one purpose, to keep John Bourque in charge as a majority shareholder and see that all company officers will be issued millions upon millions of share for services at a BORK pps sub penny to maximize number issued.

Doug