InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 994
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2011

Re: gotmilk post# 24065

Sunday, 10/25/2015 11:04:45 PM

Sunday, October 25, 2015 11:04:45 PM

Post# of 28688
All possibly true, but why bother increasing the royalties , or having a royalty at all for that matter?

If the whole thing is an elaborate ruse, I could understand the large quantity of shares issued. But why bother with putting a royalty clause in at all if there's never going to be any sales?

Unless it's an even more elaborate ruse, like Paul Newman in The Sting? A double head fake?

Either way it's a mistake long term. There's literally very few people interested based on the anemic daily share volume, and even this board is left with less than 10 regular posters.

Until they eventually sell something or fade away, not much will happen with the value of anyone's shares, including those holding hundreds of millions of them