InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 123812
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 329
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/02/2006

Re: A deleted message

Tuesday, 06/27/2006 12:28:02 AM

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:28:02 AM

Post# of 123812
Proof That Canadian Judges Consider All Canadians
As Being Corporate Entities


Criminal Code of Canada - Notice to corporation

621. (1) The clerk of the court or the prosecutor may, where an indictment is filed against a corporation, cause a notice of the indictment to be served on the corporation.

Comment: This is the only place where indictments are authorised, and for corporations, not for full liability People. The Common Law and the Magna Carta allow ONLY "Good Men of the Neighbourhood" - a Grand Jury to take a man to court.

Contents of notice

(2) A notice of an indictment referred to in subsection (1) shall set out the nature and purport of the indictment and advise that, unless the corporation appears on the date set out in the notice or the date fixed pursuant to subsection 548(2.1), and enters a plea, a plea of not guilty will be entered for the accused by the court, and that the trial of the indictment will be preceded with as though the corporation had appeared and pleaded.
R.S. 1985, c, C-46, S. 621; 1997, c. 18, s.71

Comment: The entering of a plea by a judge is done frequently against Canadians. This activity is only authorized in the Criminal Code of Canada for an accused corporation.

This means that all Canadians are considered corporations or corporate entities; or, the judges have unlawfully assumed authority for which there is no basis. Since the civil codified system (Criminal Code of Canada) is ONLY applicable to corporations or corporate entities, and not to full liability men with God Given rights, that means that Canadians judges are arch-traitors to the People of Canada when they unlawfully assume jurisdiction over them by imagining that they are corporations, and should be facing the death penalty, the penalty for TRAITORS.

Treason is not only aiding the enemy in time of war. It is the act of a servant overthrowing the authority and rights of the master or sovereign. The Canadian People are sovereign over all levels of government.





The REASONS for the Affidavit:

Protocols within the Code (Uniform Commercial Code - UCC)
The foundational maxims of the underlying commercial law, from which all law and commerce
in the world today derive, are:


*A workman is worthy of his hire.
*All are equal under the law (moral and natural law). In commerce truth is sovereign.

*Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

*An unrebutted claim, charge, or affidavit stands as the truth in commerce.

*An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgement in commerce.

*All matters must be expressed to be resolved. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.

*Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (one who has not been damaged by, given to, lost on account of,
or put at risk by another has no basis to make claims or charges against him/her).

*A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by counter affidavit point-for-point,
resolution by jury, or payment.

The reason, this scenario prevails is because the world has been set up to run precisely this way.
We (the slaves) were just not supposed to figure it out. Code is Set in Stone

For a greater expansion of the Maxims of Commercial Law, Click Here

It MUST be understood that in this fraud that makes you a corporate entity, the Canadian (and American) courts determine whether you are, or are not a corporate member subject to the Crown, or to the corporate UNITED STATES, in the PRE-TRIAL HEARING.

That is, in fact, the so-called "TRIAL" where you MUST have the above noted affidavit, and have it read into the transcript. If you are charged under any statute, the actual trial is an administrative procedure of a dissident slave. Therefore, one must be persistant in demanding that the affidavit denying corporate existence be refuted point by point, or demand that it stand as truth prior to the termination of the pre-trial hearing. The result should only be the quashing of the case for want of proper jurisdiction; and, this upon your request for a motion to quash.


THE SOURCE OF THIS ARTICLE IS DETAX CANADA

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.