KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[lesnshawn]

Popt: No, it's intellectually stingy. The only way one can believe both KEYO DE parent and NV sub were involuntarily dissolved is if Tom W., Dr.SS, the corporate attorneys and accounts all just forgot to file the papers.

In other words, it would require it to be surmised that they were (or, are) all completely incompetent. After all, they told the world they voluntarily liquidated and dissolved Keyon Communications, Inc. in 2012 but THEY NEVER DID.

So, either they had some reason to purposely LIE to the public in Sept. 2012 when they released their "Notice of Cessation of Operations" since they stated it then that they liquidated and dissolved, OR, everybody involved w/ KEYO, up to and including Tom W. and Dr.SS, are complete idiots.

Is that what we're to believe, they're complete idiots? Otherwise, they must've had a specific reason or in other words, an agenda for KEYO, to purposely NOT dissolve either the sub or parent companies for another 30 months after they told the world they already did.

Regarding my correspondence w/ Tom W. when he personally shared the notice w/ me, in particular read my last question to him and his reply to it. What did he state? He unequivocally stated that the notice applied to ALL ENTITIES.

The notice, which has been publicly available for some time, applies to all entities. Las Vegas, NV was referenced because it was the Company's headquarters location.

So, that begs the question...Why the 2 1/2 year wait to finally go forth w/ officially filing the certificates of dissolution w/ the states?

Or, didn't they? Was is the State of NV that took it upon themselves to reinstate the NV sub for the purpose of dissolving it involuntarily for KEYO their own book keeping benefit? Same goes for the DE dissolution as well (although it never had to reinstate because it was still 100% current and active).

If that's the line of thought then it would have to fleshed out then why it's supposed they did that given there are only five grounds they have to do so.

But, moot point really since because they never dissolved in 2012, therefore Tom W. was still technically President for any legal purposes or actions regarding both Keyon NV sub and KEYO DE parent at the time they actually, formally filled certificates of dissolutions w/ their respective states of incorporation in 2014.

The problem w/ the idea of the involuntary dissolution ASSUMPTION is that one must believe there was no one left w/ any authority to file the reinstatement and dissolution requests. Meanwhile, they never left all these years.

lns

p.s. - From what I've read, unlike DE, the dissolution period for NV is two years so I guess we only have five months to get our final answer to this mystery.