InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 7520
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/10/2010

Re: JG36 post# 115530

Friday, 10/09/2015 12:07:34 PM

Friday, October 09, 2015 12:07:34 PM

Post# of 146202
While this statement is generally true:

And yes, real scientists don't take a claim seriously until it has been put through peer review and published.


It is not unusual for scientists working in industry to delay trying to put their results into peer review for quite some time after the work has been done and the processes that they are working on have been validated and put into production.

Some pieces of their work (things involving IP, potentially patentable drugs, processes, or equipment, and things that involve 'trade secrets' may never be published in peer-reviewed locations.

Much,... ado,.... being made,.... about almost nothing here.

added in edit:
BTW - I am a real scientist,.... and I take their claims seriously because I have personally seen the plant, met the people involved, and have asked some fairly direct questions.

Peer review isn't the only way to judge success or failure of a science project.

“The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.”
- Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News