InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 513
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2003

Re: bogey1 post# 35083

Monday, 10/05/2015 8:58:14 AM

Monday, October 05, 2015 8:58:14 AM

Post# of 38056
bogey,

Regarding your statement.

First, review the fact that when you oxidize(burn) a molecule, like a hydrocarbon, the process produces H2O and CO2 and a byproduct called heat or energy. It is an engery yielding reaction.
So, if you claim to have a gizmo that reverses that reaction, you better show up with a source of energy to undo what burning the hydrocarbon produced.



Actually, they do have a source of energy: electrical energy. However, the amount of electrical energy seems on the low side, since they claim that the device is powered by less than 20 amps

For what it's worth, they are not claiming to reverse the whole reaction. (In fact, they are not claiming to reverse any of the reaction, as they would not be reforming hydrocarbons from the CO2, but rather converting it to carbon and oxygen.) Still, the energy input of less than 20 amps seems low for doing this.

Also, if you search "dissociation of carbon dioxide", you will find several different articles by several different sources. So, I am assuming that the science is actually valid. However, I still have a hard time envisioning how it would be practical to be used for a car exhaust system.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.