InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59409
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: capted post# 44939

Saturday, 10/03/2015 8:55:20 AM

Saturday, October 03, 2015 8:55:20 AM

Post# of 75082
It's a little late to drop the lawsuit. Huffman.....

failed to address in a complaint filed with the Florida Bar why he hasn't corrected the record with the Court regarding compliance of an Order by Judge Martha Cook. Instead he went on a rant about the Defendant but never addressed this most obvious discrepancy.

Email from Craig to the Defendant last November acknowledging he received the Interrogatories.....


$6 Man (edited),

I take it by your service of interrogatories and request for production that you are now waiving the 60 day period of abeyance that the Court graciously allowed you in order to find counsel to represent you. Such was not part of the announced Court Order, and your doing so is not in conformity with her Order as announced and agreed to by all parties at the last hearing. As the Court had ordered the abeyance, we are at a loss as to why you sent these matters. If you were wishing to proceed with the case pro se (representing yourself) then you should not be filing for continuances as you did and asking for the time to gain counsel, which was granted.

As such, we will be submitting the Court Order that you do not agree with the version sent to you. I am attaching the motion for punitive damages again, which we will be pursuing in the case with a hearing for such filing. We will not be supplying you with exhibit A at this time, nor responding to your discovery requests given the interim of the 60 day period which was ordered as an abeyance of action.

Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
E-mail: Craig@securuslawgroup.com


Here's what Huffman told the Court in June, which was they didn't get the Interrogatories until June.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527320/BS-Notice-of-Compliance-from-SFRX

This is what the Defendant filed with the Court in January, which was GRANTED.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/283527462/Motion-to-Compel-SFRX

The docket clearly shows the Motion was GRANTED in January.

01/08/2015 ORDER ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERRGOTORIES AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS TO PRODUCE..................GRANTED........01/06/15 MJC


They've doubled down on the lawsuit and they've decided it's win at all cost, even if it means LIE in order to cover up another LIE.

Hopefully Kyle and Craig will get sanctioned hard and heavy real soon. The classless bastards want the Defendant to go to jail.

They are real POS those two......

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News