InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 220
Posts 16181
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 06/02/2007

Re: Net-Man post# 52590

Thursday, 10/01/2015 9:55:49 AM

Thursday, October 01, 2015 9:55:49 AM

Post# of 53980
"having a plan in place to get FASC re-listed is important and I know Brian has been working on one."

That rather invites the question of why he let the stock get suspended in the first place.

He knew it would happen - even the SEC warned him, although he lied to one of his long-term shareholders and told him they hadn't contacted him - and yet he simply didn't bother to make his legally required filings with SEC.

If Brian Nichols (or anyone else at FASC) cared tuppence about their retail victims, he simply wouldn't have let this happen in the first place.

It would take a frankly misplaced trust in his nature to think he's suddenly going to do the right thing after all these year of resolutely doing the opposite.

Although I do fully expect him to petition his existing victims for extra funds under cover of paying for steps to get the ticker re-listed.

After all, the easiest source of new funds for fraudsters is from existing victims rather than new ones.

I would counsel any existing retail shareholders to be very chary about those solicitations for extra funds if and when they come.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair

"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."

H. L. Mencken

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.