InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 829
Posts 119609
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: stockbettor post# 14609

Wednesday, 09/30/2015 8:24:52 PM

Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:24:52 PM

Post# of 20689

…even if the Federal Circuit reverses its prior decision against MNTA in the next few months and the District Court in Massachusetts then upholds MNTA's patents, which may add another year or 2 to the original litigation.

If the CAFC rules for MNTA, there’s a pretty good chance of a settlement to the Lovenox patent case—and all outstanding litigation with AMPH—IMO.

AMPH’s new lawsuit may be intended as a bargaining chip in an overall settlement.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”