InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 185
Posts 10548
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/23/2007

Re: DewDiligence post# 117

Monday, 09/28/2015 8:16:39 PM

Monday, September 28, 2015 8:16:39 PM

Post# of 438
I think both statements are true. Here's a difficulty I think many Investor's are having with today's language on the FDA's position on CVOT:

$ESPR's previous PR and this one, unfortunately. Which is:

"…will not require (CVOT)"

vs

"…(CVOT) could be required."

That's a pretty big discrepancy from what they originally communicated to investors versus what they said today with HUGE a implication.

Management screwed up.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ESPR News