LOL. Funny you mentioned that after I complained. How about all the missing years? Are they going to include those? Why don't they do audited financials? Oh, I know. They can afford it. Heck, a company doing a few hundred thousands a year on the average over nearly a decade (If we accept for the same of the argument that those numbers are true) cannot afford to do that. And, as the numbers show, they can't even afford a decent bookkeeper.
But actually, it is even worse than that. The discrepancy in the numbers show an outright attempt to defraud. Only a person that is fully ignorant would buy the stock now just based on the omission of the negative "retained earnings" from the end of '14 to the end of the first QT or '15. That is such a glaring disregard for what has been stated in the past in order to make things look better that everybody who even takes a passing look at this company would run the other way.
I do not understand why management is this incompetent. They have show the total inability to even properly handle the numbers of the outfit. They are even poor scammers. This is just as bad as the claim that they had 19 million in contracts a few years back. You would think that this people would try to come up with schemes that at least would make it seem plausible that this is a real company. But they are not even good scammers.
