InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 180
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/15/2013

Re: ls7550 post# 39889

Wednesday, 09/02/2015 5:31:01 PM

Wednesday, September 02, 2015 5:31:01 PM

Post# of 47081
Hi Clive,

Thanks.

I actually did some back-testing using Ocroft's at some point and I did find it adds value, roughly around 1% / year.

I suppose with midway re-balancing you would want not buy/sell too soon, esp. in a trending market, right? Hence the reason it worked better since 2007 (down big then up big). I am not sure it adds value in a side-way market though, or does it?

But back to my question on how to re-balance a SHY/GLD/SPXL/XIV portfolio, which you linked to in your previous post.

On what components or combination of components would you apply this rebalancing mechanism (e.g. 10% bands + midway + Ocroft's) on? It obviously does not apply to SHY and I am thinking that it does not apply to gold either.

If I read what you wrote correctly, and if I were to apply it on the equity portion, not including gold: using a 10% band means the SPXL+XIV combined weight (target ~20%) would have to drop below 10% or rise above 30%, which is easily achievable given the ~3.63X leverage. I suppose a better band would 12%, i.e. their weight falling to 8% or rising above 32%. That happened in 2011 and I am sure in 2008-2009 that combination would have easily lost 90% or more.

It is all about a good re-balancing system in the end esp. when using such leveraged products.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.