InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1354
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/11/2014

Re: jimtash post# 29768

Monday, 08/31/2015 6:40:19 PM

Monday, August 31, 2015 6:40:19 PM

Post# of 30046
UNI would want a listed shell . . . a revoked, debt burdened, right to return NON-shell is not very attractive . . .

mac revoked the stock after he moved the assets to ADI . . . he left the debt and shareholders behind . . . it's been well over a year since revocation, and there is no excuse whatsoever to delay a market return . . . the only logical explanation is that retail owns the shares, and no execs have any reason to revive them . . . after a few years the penalties go up . . . the 2014 filing will trigger that clause, imo . . .

insurance paid the CA, without insurance rosen never would have filed . . .

as for UNI's efforts, kudos . . . it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the former radient . . . royalties (if any) go to ADI . . .

i'm trying to pick the pocket of the big guys, while they're too busy robbing the bank to notice . . . long only . . .

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.