Yeah, it's just going to be sucked out the top of the tower by the prevailing winds no matter.
Then there's that whole unsolved issue with laminar flow. . . The tower won't have it even if some air goes down.
Then I contacted one of the experts they were touting and he quickly distanced himself from any implied endorsement of the tower stating that they only asked him about a single narrow aspect of the turbines.
Then there's the much touted Israeli mock up where the idiots put dry ice at the top of a tube. Hilarious.
It will never be built. SWET should refocus their efforts on cold fusion.
Well, yes, but it really reduces to the knapsack problem in that case. Do you have some kind of heuristic, or are we dealing with an NP-complete case?