InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 105
Posts 43434
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/13/2010

Re: rubs1 post# 97964

Tuesday, 08/25/2015 10:29:41 AM

Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:29:41 AM

Post# of 112299
I am not assuming anything. The start of this thread was the assumption that Porter is not receiving compensation simply because he "couldn't" be mis-categorizing it. After all, the filings are just so accurate in every other detail. (Not)

The assumption that Daddy consultant is not a consultant is rather far fetched as well.

I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.