InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 10251
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2008

Re: martych post# 919

Friday, 08/21/2015 1:36:49 PM

Friday, August 21, 2015 1:36:49 PM

Post# of 970
Actually, they did, and that was the reason for the denial, and the failure on appeal.

"The judge, Susan Illston of the United States District Court in Northern California, issued a ruling on Wednesday that the patent was invalid because it covered a natural phenomenon — the presence of DNA from the fetus in the mother’s blood."

How can this be any more clear? How can there even be a discussion on whether or not this was the reason for the ruling?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.