InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,048.42
(
-0.46%
)
US TECH 100
17,168.35
(
0.63%
)
Dow Jones
38,085.80
(
-0.98%
)
Brent Oil
88.14
(
-0.02%
)
Bitcoin
64,512.43
(
0.04%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

litton51

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

litton51

Re: wooden post# 60879

Wednesday, 08/19/2015 2:50:32 PM

Wednesday, August 19, 2015 2:50:32 PM

Post# of 60937
>>I would think that since TM claimed, and won, in court the fact that they were not infringing, Its a free for all on CLYW's 923 and TM can't say a word about it! Receiver isn't saying anything either. But as it stands, we are all still in limbo!! Go figure!

>>My question remains, what is the Judge that ordered the Receiver on this case saying???

Nothing.

>>How long has it been now???

Depends upon when you started counting. I started buying in 2004. Judge ordered receivership over two years ago. Receiver remains silent.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up