Deep Blue Marine (DPBE)

[Capt Billy]

[quote:
While the division of artifacts was an incentive to commercial companies, it was not always handled
wisely by those companies and unfortunately DBM was a prime example of questionable business dealings from the CEO down. Just the presence of so many disgruntled investors for so long is indicative of these problems. This started long before the contract expired.]

This would be of no concern to ONPCS as the contract was awarded to a person not a company. All contracts were awarded to individuals not companies. The ability to raise funds would be the companies burden and DBM is not a subject of any "questionable business dealings" or any criminal investigation that I am aware of. Please provide proof.

quote:
Any company that worked here should have been forthcoming with information to investors.
This is not my area of law, but I believe a US public company has the fiduciary responsibility of transparency in its financial dealings, and DBM is clouded in confusion]

Again this would not be the concern of ONPCS. The contract was awarded to DBM while they were a public trading company. There were no criteria then for “fiduciary responsibility of transparency in its financial dealings” why would that have changed. Again the contract was under an individual name not any company.

quote:
the days of it being divided up on a table are past forever.]

Jeimy would know as she was the last one to sit at that table.

Here is a photo of my expert Dominican diver holding up yet another questionable recovered artifact.