Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

That's what SFRX claimed in the Motion to Quash.......

Your post clearly States that a motion for contempt was filed against the Defendant for violating a Court Order against the Defendant for Posting on this Board.

To date they haven't filed anything. It was posted by a lender months ago the Defendant was violating an ORDER and sent the "alleged" violations to the company. But SFRX has not filed squat, they just want to SQUASH and protect those that post false info about the company so they can sell their HEAVILY discounted shares, while they pretend to believe there is treasure.

But, I have a Question. Is the Defendant allowed to post on this board or is there a Court Order against it?

Here's the ORDER. Does it state he can't post here? Does it say he's GUILTY....as it "alleged"?

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

AND REJECTING STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, filed September 30, 2014. After reviewing the Motion, the court file, and record, the Court finds that it must REJECT the Motion in part as to the Consent Final Judgment, but GRANT the parties' agreed upon consent for entry of a Permanent Injunction. The Court finds that the Consent Final Judgment awards damages in the amount of over ten million dollar against the Defendant; however, these damages are not supported by any competent evidence presented to this Court to date.

The Court finds that Defendant is proceeding pro se, and in that capacity, admitted via his telephone appearance at the September 30, 2014, hearing that he "skimmed" the Motion and Consent Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction, and that he simply "wanted this to go away. "

He volunteered that after hearing from the Plaintiff in the prior hearing he had no problem in refraining from posting online criticisms of Plaintiff, and that in fact he had not posted anything negative regarding Plaintiff for over 48 hours. Accordingly, the Court accepts Defendant's consent to this injunction, but notes that absent such agreement, the Court would not be authorized under the law to compel such a broad based injunctive relief.

The Court has a duty to administer justice and cannot, in good conscience, rubber stamp that portion of the motion for Consent Final Judgment at this time, absent an evidentiary hearing and proof of entitlement to such damages.

It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Stipulated Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment is hereby REJECTED in part; the parties consent to issuance of a Permanent Injunction is GRANTED.

I can't wait to see the next motion filed in the SFRX Court Case.

Got the hearing coming up on the 13th. I look forward to that.