InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 764
Posts 43017
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 03/11/2004

Re: Greenaccountingbean post# 59249

Friday, 07/31/2015 3:53:56 PM

Friday, July 31, 2015 3:53:56 PM

Post# of 68424
I'm almost afraid to even comment on that due to the myriad of factors that could be involved. However, keeping in mind TONS of things could happen, it would be possible that V could issue a subpoena duces tecum to a GOOG employee that would require them to appear for a deposition as well as to produce requested documents at that deposition PROVIDED the court would allow that at this point. It's "possible" under the orders in effect they may be able to do that already, I just don't know. Additionally, one would have to expect GOOG would fight the hell out of it, just because they could, if no other reason. A total myriad of things could happen IF this was to take place. It would be probable that IF there was a subpoena duces tecum issued that V would have to give the deponent 30 days notice to comply with the request to provide documents to bring to the deposition.

Again, there are really too many things to go into that could happen, but is it possible? Yes, I think it's possible if allowed by the Court.





greenaccountingbeen Friday, 07/31/15 03:27:20 PM
Re: JJSeabrook post# 59248
Post # of 59250

Thanks JJ.
Following up on the question I posed, do you believe Google can be forced to turn over evidence and testify as part of the ZTE drama given the latest developments? If they knew or should have known they were illegally provided confidential info (assuming this is so) , would Google be legally bound to report that to both Vringo and the authorities?



I am not a broker and profess to know nothing about trading stocks. Do your own DD. Buy, don't buy...sell, or don't sell at your own risk.