XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[JJSeabrook]

I don't believe the ZTE drama has anything at all to do with the appeal currently at SCOTUS, nor would the mention of any of this be relevant, IMO. The trial made the basis of that appeal was already concluded before any NDA was ever even entered into with ZTE. Also, it has nothing to do with any of the facts in the trial of the case in chief with GOOG. The GOOG appeal mainly deals with the manner of review used by CAFC more than it does the actual facts of the case so no, I don't believe it matters nor would be mentioned in V's reply brief.

Lastly, I DO still believe GOOG's response is timely filed with SCOTUS whether anyone can put their eyeballs on it or find out whether it's happened or not for sure. I believe it will still surface and V will be filing their reply to G's response.


nfp Friday, 07/31/15 02:01:22 PM
Re: greenaccountingbeen post# 59243
Post # of 59247

Very interesting point. JJ you'll probably think this is ridiculous but had to ask: could it be possible that Google paused for a moment before submitting their response to the Supreme Court, because if they DO reply then VRNG can reply to their reply & introduce some of this new ZTE news into the discussion? Whereas if they don't reply VRNG will not have the opportunity to do so? Or is that just ignorant crazy talk?