InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 11129
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2014

Re: jessellivermore post# 54836

Wednesday, 07/29/2015 7:17:09 AM

Wednesday, July 29, 2015 7:17:09 AM

Post# of 423976
JL, I completely agree with your description of the Adcom and even agree that it would make little sense for Adam F to opine in the way he did if he had inside information about the fix.

But it still remains that anyone thinking about an Advisory Committee hearing for V based on the Anchor study wouldn't have a thought about bringing up proof of CVD risk as - like you mentioned - the study was not designed to speak to that in any sense whatsoever.

So I don't think anyone in on the "plan" would have divulged it to Adam F, but if he somehow obtained the idea that it might happen in such a way the only possible explanation for him using that info to spout about his opinion of the coming Adcom that I can think of is the ego and self-importance that some of these guys like Adam possess. They want to show that they are smarter than everyone else.

Again I would not bet on that reasoning or scenario but would really love to find out how he would have come up with such a lucky guess. Because believe me no one and their mother would have guessed (based on logic) that the direction of the meeting would have been twisted in such a way.

Appreciate you insight.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News